Process
Areas
(staged)

Level 2
 
RM
 PP
 PMC
 SAM
 MA
 PPQA
 CM
Level 3
 
RD
 TS
 PI
 VE
 VA
 OPF
 OPD
 OT
 IPM
 RSKM
 DAR
Level 4
 
OPP
 QPM
Level 5
 
OID
 CAR

          3.1. Introduction
              Choosing a Representation
 Comparison of the Continuous and Staged Representations

Table 1.1 compares the advantages of each representation and may assist you with determining which representation is right for your organization.

  

Table 1.1 Comparative Advantages of Continuous and Staged Representations

Continuous Representation

Staged Representation

Grants explicit freedom to select the order of improvement that best meets the organization’s business objectives and mitigates the organization’s areas of risk

Enables organizations to have a predefined and proven improvement path

Enables increased visibility of the capability achieved in each individual process area

Focuses on a set of processes that provide an organization with a specific capability that is characterized by each maturity level

Allows improvements of different processes to be performed at different rates

Summarizes process improvement results in a simple form—a single maturity level number

Reflects a newer approach that does not yet have the data to demonstrate its ties to return on investment

Builds on a relatively long history of use that includes case studies and data that demonstrate return on investment

Table  | Images  | Glossary  | Index  | Faceted index


Process
Areas
(continuous)


Process
management  
 
OPF
 OPD
 OT  
 
OPP 
 
OID
Project
management
 
PP
 PMC
 SAM 
 
IPM
 RSKM
 
QPM
Engineering
 
RD
 RM
 TS
 PI
 VE
 VA
Support
 
CM
 PPQA
 MA
 
DAR
 CAR