Organizations can achieve progressive improvements in their organizational maturity by achieving control first at the project level and continuing to the most advanced level—organization-wide continuous process improvement—using
both quantitative and qualitative data to make decisions.
Since improved organizational maturity is associated with improvement in the range of expected results that can be achieved by an organization, it is one way of predicting the general outcomes of the organization’s next project. For
instance, at maturity level 2, the organization has been elevated from ad hoc to disciplined by establishing sound project management. As your organization achieves the generic and specific goals for the set of process areas in a maturity level, you
are increasing your organizational maturity and reaping the benefits of process improvement. Because each maturity level forms a necessary foundation for the next level, trying to skip maturity levels is usually counterproductive.
At the same time, you must recognize that process improvement efforts should focus on the needs of the organization in the context of its business environment and that process areas at higher maturity levels may address the current
needs of an organization or project. For example, organizations seeking to move from maturity level 1 to maturity level 2 are frequently encouraged to establish a process group, which is addressed by the Organizational Process Focus process area
that resides at maturity level 3. Although a process group is not a necessary characteristic of a maturity level 2 organization, it can be a useful part of the organization’s approach to achieving maturity level 2.
This situation is sometimes characterized as establishing a maturity level 1 process group to bootstrap the maturity level 1 organization to maturity level 2. Maturity level 1 process improvement activities may depend primarily on
the insight and competence of the process group staff until an infrastructure to support more disciplined and widespread improvement is in place.
Organizations can institute specific process improvements at any time they choose, even before they are prepared to advance to the maturity level at which the specific practice is recommended. In such situations, however,
organizations should understand that the success of these improvements is at risk because the foundation for their successful institutionalization has not been completed. Processes without the proper foundation may fail at the very point they are
needed most—under stress.
A defined process that is characteristic of a maturity level 3 organization can be placed at great risk if maturity level 2 management practices are deficient. For example, management may commit to a poorly planned schedule or fail
to control changes to baselined requirements. Similarly, many organizations prematurely collect the detailed data characteristic of maturity level 4, only to find the data uninterpretable because of inconsistencies in processes and measurement
definitions.
Another example of using processes associated with higher maturity-level process areas is in the building of products. Certainly, we would expect maturity level 1 organizations to perform requirements analysis, design, integration,
and verification. These activities are not described until maturity level 3, however, where they are described as the coherent, well-integrated engineering processes that complement a maturing project management capability, put in place so that the
engineering improvements are not lost by an ad hoc management process.